Wednesday, July 11, 2007
The Final Update
This will probably be the last update of this blog. For the final project of this class, we decided to make an NGO that appeals to the world for the complete elimination of dirty weapons such as depleted uranium bombs and neutron bombs. Lately we have been updating a blog about nuclear weapons in IE class. But we’ve just found out that the issue is so big that there is nothing much we can do about it so we decided to make one about depleted uranium bombs as our first step. Even though depleted uranium bombs are not as dreadful as regular nuclear weapons such as atomic bombs and hydrogen bombs, they are actually nuclear weapons that are used in reality. There are some NGOs about them and we can be one of them.
Thursday, June 28, 2007
Dirty Weapons Used In Reality
Neutron bombs and depleted uranium ammunitions are still being used in battle fields in the Middle East.
You may not know what they actually are so I will make a brief explanation. Depleted uranium ammunitions are bullets or shells charged with nuclear wastes for intensification. Neutron given off from neutron bombs goes through buildings and constructions without damaging them and affects only organic creatures.
Even though they are not as destructive as atomic bombs and hydrogen bombs, they can still be classified as genuine nuclear weapons. Good many soldiers and local people are suffering from leukemia and the most likely cause of this is probably these small nuclear weapons I was just talking about.
Considering the inhumanity of these weapons, I think we'd better strat inhibiting the use of them.
You may not know what they actually are so I will make a brief explanation. Depleted uranium ammunitions are bullets or shells charged with nuclear wastes for intensification. Neutron given off from neutron bombs goes through buildings and constructions without damaging them and affects only organic creatures.
Even though they are not as destructive as atomic bombs and hydrogen bombs, they can still be classified as genuine nuclear weapons. Good many soldiers and local people are suffering from leukemia and the most likely cause of this is probably these small nuclear weapons I was just talking about.
Considering the inhumanity of these weapons, I think we'd better strat inhibiting the use of them.
Wednesday, June 6, 2007
Nuclear issue can be linked to many other contraversial issues like the ones you are dealing with. Whatever the problem is, the United States is always involeved and who's at the very center of the movement is George W Bush.
He has contributed to many questionable policies so far. What we cannot overlook above all is commiting an act of aggression against other nations. Their excuse for invading Iraq was to disarm Iraq of massive destructive weapons . which are still not found.
This is kind of getting off the main subject but have a look at the video I have posted below. What i'm trying to tell is that only the chosen few are holding controll of the world and act contrary to wills of the masses.
He has contributed to many questionable policies so far. What we cannot overlook above all is commiting an act of aggression against other nations. Their excuse for invading Iraq was to disarm Iraq of massive destructive weapons . which are still not found.
This is kind of getting off the main subject but have a look at the video I have posted below. What i'm trying to tell is that only the chosen few are holding controll of the world and act contrary to wills of the masses.
Thursday, May 31, 2007
The NPT and The IAEA
First things first. I need to apologize that the information i gave in the introduction was not accurate. The Three anti nuclear principles established by the then Prime Minister, Eisaku Sato in the year 1968 were actually just Japanese policy towards nuclear and the other countries have nothing to do with this. My apologies.
You might have heard words like IAEA and NPT while watching news about North Korea. Let me explain the meanings of them in simple words.
The NPT (Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty) is an international treaty opened for signature on July 1, 1968 to limit the spread of nuclear weapons. There are 188 sovereign states party to the treaty. Back then, the 5 nations that were involved in the nuclear arms race promised not to give nor help other nations make nuclear weapons. Then again, the rest promised not to recive nor make any of them.
Nuclear generation became the main source of electric power in many countries as we made the transition to the new energy environment. However, wastes from nuclear power plants contain plutonium which can be a material for atomic bombs. So there is a rule in NPT that all nuclear power plants must operate under proper checks and restraints. The IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) exists for this reason. It works with its member states and multiple partners worldwide to promote safe, secure and peaceful nuclear technologies.
About 20 years ago, North Korea as well decied to make a nuclear power plant and asked The Soviet Union how to make one. The Soviet Union accepted this with a qualification and North Korea was required to join the NPT. When a country entres the NPT, every nuclear power plant in the country will be inspected regulary by agents sent by IAEA. The problem is North Korea excluded these agents from its power plants, and quit NPT. The definite weakness of this treaty is it's not strict enough. Of course the attitude of this country is intolerable from a commonsence standpoint but the agency could have taken some sort of action to avoid this situation. Talking of the laxness of the NPT, India, Israel and Pakistan are not even members of it.
The NPT has some more shortcomings. Some people may complain about countries like United States appealing for this agreement. Practically, these countries are contradicting themselves by possessing nuclear weapons.
As the only victim of atomic bomb, Japan must voluntarily advocate the dreadfullness of nuclear weapons and contribute to abolition of nuclear armaments.
You might have heard words like IAEA and NPT while watching news about North Korea. Let me explain the meanings of them in simple words.
The NPT (Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty) is an international treaty opened for signature on July 1, 1968 to limit the spread of nuclear weapons. There are 188 sovereign states party to the treaty. Back then, the 5 nations that were involved in the nuclear arms race promised not to give nor help other nations make nuclear weapons. Then again, the rest promised not to recive nor make any of them.
Nuclear generation became the main source of electric power in many countries as we made the transition to the new energy environment. However, wastes from nuclear power plants contain plutonium which can be a material for atomic bombs. So there is a rule in NPT that all nuclear power plants must operate under proper checks and restraints. The IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) exists for this reason. It works with its member states and multiple partners worldwide to promote safe, secure and peaceful nuclear technologies.
About 20 years ago, North Korea as well decied to make a nuclear power plant and asked The Soviet Union how to make one. The Soviet Union accepted this with a qualification and North Korea was required to join the NPT. When a country entres the NPT, every nuclear power plant in the country will be inspected regulary by agents sent by IAEA. The problem is North Korea excluded these agents from its power plants, and quit NPT. The definite weakness of this treaty is it's not strict enough. Of course the attitude of this country is intolerable from a commonsence standpoint but the agency could have taken some sort of action to avoid this situation. Talking of the laxness of the NPT, India, Israel and Pakistan are not even members of it.
The NPT has some more shortcomings. Some people may complain about countries like United States appealing for this agreement. Practically, these countries are contradicting themselves by possessing nuclear weapons.
As the only victim of atomic bomb, Japan must voluntarily advocate the dreadfullness of nuclear weapons and contribute to abolition of nuclear armaments.
an NGO realated to my topic
Peace Boat is a Japan-based international non-governmental and non-profit organization that works to promote peace, human rights, equal and sustainable development and respect for the environment. Peace Boat seeks to create awareness and action based on effecting positive social and political change in the world. We pursue this through the organization of global educational programmes, responsible travel, cooperative projects and advocacy activities. These activities are carried out on a partnership basis with other civil society organizations and communities in Japan, Northeast Asia, and around the world.Peace Boat carries out its main activities through a chartered passenger ship that travels the world on peace voyages. The ship creates a neutral, mobile space and enables people to engage across borders in dialogue and mutual cooperation at sea, and in the ports that we visit. Activities based on Japan and Northeast Asia are carried out from our eight Peace Centers in Japan.
Peace Boat. 30 May 2007 <http://www.peaceboat.org/english/nwps/sm/arc/050907/full.html>.
Peace Boat. 30 May 2007 <http://www.peaceboat.org/english/nwps/sm/arc/050907/full.html>.
Wednesday, May 30, 2007
Key Phrases Connected to The Topic
Pollution
Destruction
Contamination
Radioactivity
Atomic Bomb
Hydrogen Bomb
Neutron Bomb
Depleted Uranium Bomb
Hiroshima
Nagasaki
North Korea
India
Pakistan
Six Nations Talk
NPT
IAEA
Cold War
Nuclear Allergy
Nuclear Disarmament
Nuclear Inspection
Nuclear Deterrent
Nuclear Test
Nuclear Umbrella
Nuclear Winter
The Chernobyl Disaster
Wednesday, May 23, 2007
Which Side Are You On?
As I mentioned in the introduction, I am strongly against nuclear weapons and hoping they would someday be eliminated from the surface of the earth.
The reasons are that they are good for nothing and too risky. They are also against humanity. If you ever saw the sight of Hiroshima after being bombed, probably you'd get the same idea. Many people in the world have the same idea.
Please let me know why you think nuclear weapons are continuously being produced and which side you're on. They always say it's for self defence but I do not think such highly destructive weapons are suitable for defending themselves.
By the way the strongest hydrogen bomb in the history have a nuclear punch equal to 3300 Hiroshimas. scary isn't it?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)